Dear all,

I believe that it is very important that every Project Implementation Unit must be able (and allowed) in evaluate not only its results in terms of outreach but also the performance of the staff involved, at every level. In conducting this evaluation (and auto-evaluation) the organization will become stonger and stronger (for example, weakness could be identified and "fixed" with ad hoc trainings) ...but of course there are high risks of misunderstunding and mismanagement of this tool...

What is your experience and what practical advice could you give me?

Many thanks


Views: 228

Any comment to this

Replies to This Discussion

Dear Jaap,

Very interesting indeed. I have have asking the same question to a lot of people, I guess there is not just 1 simple anwer. A lot depends on the context on the "management" style and the political and cultural context o the project.

What is sure that it is defenitly important that the project has in place formal or informal mechanisms to perceive the satisfaction and to assess the performance (not only in terms of # of activities implemented) of the staff in order to go in the direction od EMPOWERMENT and improved performance and dialogue.

The search continues...

Jaap Pels said:

See attached.

Reply to Discussion


Donate !

We all get a great deal out of our engagement in KM4Dev. Maybe you would be happy to express appreciation through a regular voluntary contribution. Crowd funding works! 

background and info



note if the donate link above does not work for you, click here on donate! and at the bottom of that page click on the donate logo



© 2024       Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service