Brighton 2000 Evaluation Comments

On the rating of resources the following averages were obtained:

  • Facilitation: 8.35 out of 10 (23 responses)
  • Binder: 8.32 out of 10 (22 responses)
  • Website: 8.00 out of 10 (19 responses)

In your opinion, which departments from your organisation should be represented at a workshop like this? Check as many as apply:

  • Policy and/or Planning13
  • Program Delivery 12
  • Management of Information Systems (MIS)13
  • Library 8
  • Other:
    • Human Resources 5
    • Evaluation 4
    • Partners in the South 2
    • Southern offices 1
    • Communications + Publishing Services 1
    • Finance 1

Are there any other organisations that you would have liked to have seen in attendance at the workshop? Please specify:

  • Development Research Instititutions
  • European NGOs (other than UK-based)
  • LBL (Swiss competence centre for agricultural extension)
  • A Southern perspective
  • OFSE (Austria)
  • DSE
  • More consultants from other European countries (e.g. Geneva Knowledge Group)
  • Information organisations (e.g. Dialog)
  • Consultants (e.g. E & Y, Arthur Andersen)
  • French aid program
  • UN "content" organisations (e.g. FAO)
  • EIB
  • The South deserves a separate workshop
  • This group is appropriate as a CoP

Topics that you would like to have seen included?

  • Some time for trying out practical application (e.g. of mapping) � role playing
  • In-depth knowledge mapping (more concrete)
  • More practical sessions
  • More about organisational learning
  • Making knowledge sharing relevant to the poor; how can KM contribute to development in the South
  • Knowledge strategy and its relation to the organisation�s fundamental mission / vision / philosophy
  • The links between: a) knowledge strategy for OD; b) knowledge strategy for programme work in the field; c) knowledge policy issues (e.g. IPRs as they relate to development)
  • Where is knowledge management/sharing in development organisations is different from KM in the private sector, and where is it similar
  • What is the relevance of "Northern" knowledge
  • Innovation in North-South relationships
  • What is the future of the donor organisation
  • Deeper level of technology as enabler (perhaps as option, or a special track, as it may not be relevant for everybody)
  • Other knowledge case studies outside donor organisations (e.g. Eldis, OneWorld)
  • More on knowledge creation and application (heavy emphasis on knowledge sharing)

Topics that should be removed?

  • Discussion on definitions
  • More focused sessions (only one introduction speaker per subject and more discussion)
  • The dominance of OD goals; the issue is not of our survival but our relevance to poor people
  • Less time on "generic" introductions, less business analogies/slang
  • Perhaps the HR-related issues were of less relevance than the codification /connection issues

Other comments?

  • Very interesting workshop, well organised
  • More time for reflections and discussion; cut down questions after presentations for more discussion time
  • Tea breaks and interval between sessions were unrealistic! Excellent conference, though
  • I learnt a lot!
  • Far too much and too many presentations � need more discussion groups and workshop assignments
  • Follow-up meeting (refresher + what each of us made out of this workshop); consolidation of "start-ups"
  • One of the most useful workshops I have attended for many years. By far the best knowledge workshop I have attended � it has significantly helped my thinking in a number of key areas. Thanks
  • Too much "downloading". A lot to digest. A useful workshop.
  • Please restrict all presentations to 20 minutes maximum! Any more than that is mostly pointless. People must be brief and to the point!
  • Next event should have fewer talking heads. More interaction. Probably shorter. More focus on specific collaborate tasks. But overall, a very successful event � well organised, facilitated and hosted. In fact, a great success. Well done!
  • Thanks to Lyle for the excellent moderation!
  • Binder is very useful; contacts were useful; case stories and benchmarking very interesting; good food for thought! A good workshop. Helps us to take the next step
  • Interesting topics and dedicated speakers � Great, but: too tight a program, so much information (and knowledge) without given time to reflect. Too little table discussions. Not enough time for mingling and networking
  • I find the 3 days a little bit too compact. So much information delivered in a rapidity that sometimes made me tired, especially as I am not a native English speaker. The presentations using data were so overloaded with text that I sometimes had difficulties in following what the speaker said. The audience was too diversified, which might be the result of a nor clearly identified purpose with the seminar
  • The facilitator had a lot of interesting things to say and the overviews could have been used better but they were rushed through in such a hurry that it was impossible for me to digest. Group discussions could have been given more time. Otherwise I found it a very good conference and I am inspired to continue working with KM
  • Expansion of CoP, particularly cross/multiple organisations
  • On the whole excellent!
  • Design of event included too much passive listening to presentations
  • Very well done and well organised. Table discussions could have been better structured � suggest each table has a facilitator to keep it on track

Last updated by kmfordev admin Jun 1, 2009.

Donate !

We all get a great deal out of our engagement in KM4Dev. Maybe you would be happy to express appreciation through a regular voluntary contribution. Crowd funding works! 

background and info



note if the donate link above does not work for you, click here on donate! and at the bottom of that page click on the donate logo



© 2024       Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service